back to "Impro"

Dan Richter: Thoughts on Improvisation and Improv Theater

January 2007 - excerpt

Complete Version in German

2007
01

 

 
2006
10 11 12
07 08 09
04 05 06
01 02 03
 

2005

10 11 12
07 08 09
06

 

January 1st, 2007

Helge Schneider and Improvisation
(From an interview in Galore Magazine, Jan/Feb 2007)

The essence [of improvisation] is the desire to do it. You have to feel drawn to it.

Yes. We need the desire to create. If this desire is replaced by the simple need to work or to perform, the whole purpose of improvisation is lost.

[Improvisation] requires you to be constantly thinking, even thinking in parallel, on many levels simultaneously.

Yes. Exactly – we don’t shut off our minds. “Not thinking about” what you're doing is different from shutting down your thought processes. It’s not enough to “empty yourself,” as Gunther Lösel suggests, because on the one hand, we have to be alert in order to take in what’s going on around us; on the other hand, the brain must be "warmed up" in order to create.

In my opinion, there is no such thing as bad improvisation. Merely the fact that someone is improvising is interesting in and of itself.

 

Yes. Well, you can always learn something, even from a bad performance.

Yes, of course, there will always be times when the audience response to your performance is horrible. But even this is good, because at least someone made an effort, someone performed.  When a person has no ear for music and is terrible at playing, then you won't really enjoy listening, but even so, that person gives part of themselves to the improvisation.

 

(Response to the question, if there are any art forms that he finds uninteresting:)
No.  I think all art forms are interesting as sources of creativity.

 

[You give your life perspective] when you replace distrust, jealously, or hate with happiness, fun, flexibility, emotion, or sadness.  When you understand what life is really about, then you can perfect your timing in performances.

 

Playing the saxophone and the trumpet is exactly the same thing for me.  Music is the basis, and so it doesn’t make a damn bit of difference what kind of instrument you play, whether you sing and dance while driving a car at the same time, or whatever. The less you study a particular art form, and the more you actually practice it, the less important it becomes which medium you use. I draw the same way that I play the saxophone, which is also the way I write books.  That’s how it seems to me, anyway. Every medium has a similar timing.

 

My timing is shaped by what you could call boredom.  As soon as I start to feel bored, I just quit. But as long as I’m on a roll, as long as the rhythm is there, I can’t quit.

 

 

January 5th, 2007

Heckling

Reacting to hecklers during a performance is a kind of an art form.  As a rule, you should just accept them as cheerfully as possible. It’s difficult, though, when you can’t quite understand them because the heckler is just saying something to his friends – in that case, you can usually just ignore it. Hecklers in the front row can make audience members in the back of the theater feel that they’re missing something, especially in larger performance halls. Never tell the hecklers off unless it's absolutely necessary, though.  In retrospect, when I think back on situations like this, I’m always able to come up with a better solution than telling hecklers off.

 

 

January 7th, 2007

Success

The greater the success with audiences (measured in money and the number of audience members), the more easily internal problems in a group can be covered up or tolerated, and the more likely it is that the group will be content to rest on its laurels.  A lack of success, on the other hand, carries the risk that minor problems – both artistic and personal – will get blown out of proportion. In either case, you need a kind of fundamental enthusiasm, fueled by the desire to create.  This desire must be entirely independent from money (or lack thereof).

 

 

January 8th, 2007

Taboos

Whether a scene is tasteful or tasteless usually depends not on the subject of the scene, but rather on how the subject is handled. This is especially noticeable when dealing with sensitive topics, like physical disabilities, just to name one example. At the end, it comes down to the attitude that you take towards the subject. If you have the right kind of attitude, you can even create comical scenes without being funny in a tasteless way.  I saw a scene like this in an improv theater in New York – the protagonist was deaf, and the other characters made fun of him.  In the end, though, the characters doing the teasing became the “deaf” people, who couldn't understand the world around them (a theme similar to the Paris scene in the Jarmusch film “ Night on Earth").
We shouldn’t be scared to deal with taboo topics - these scenes are usually less harmful than we think. Sometimes it also helps to think a step beyond: the idea of using the bathroom as a setting for a scene, for example, is usually rejected out of hand, even though there’s no reason why it wouldn’t be an excellent place for scenes to be acted out. It’s not like the actors would have to take a crap or anything.
You never know where the boundaries of good taste lie until you come close to overstepping them – and there’s always the risk that you will overstep them. But if we don’t test these boundaries, we remain in the realm of the virtuous, and often, the boring.

 

 

January 10th, 2007

Teaching Refinement

The piano teacher Fee had a clumsy, seven year-old student who always played so loudly that the keys on the piano clacked.  She decided to teach him how to play with his fists: she taught him a particularly simple piece that could be played by rolling his fists along the black keys on the piano.  He proceeded to play until his knuckles bled.

  

 

January 12th, 2007

Permissive and Strict

“The most important thing when teaching,” according to piano teacher Fee, “is to avoid making students feel guilty, regardless of whether they are beginners or advanced learners. They should always feel like they are discovering something new. They are allowed to make mistakes – that’s part of the learning process.  I'm only strict when it comes to fingering!"

 

 

January 13th, 2007

Technique and Elegance

Listeners of jazz singer K. sometimes pat her appreciatively on the back: “I can see that you have had voice training!" they say.  You can actually see her concentration during performances, how she forms the sound of a note, how she increases and decreases the note’s nasality to give it a particular color, how she demonstrates practiced scat-technique, etc. For her own sake, it’s good that she can accept this kind of compliment - training is the last thing a listener should want to hear in a singer’s voice. Listeners want elegance. They want to be carried away by the singer’s interpretation.  They want to smell the sweat of ecstasy, not the sweat of concentration and training. A singer should have technique, but she should also be able to forget that she has it.

 

 

January 27th, 2007

Eyes

A little smile, with your eyes down and to the left, makes you look deceitful. You see school children making this face when a teacher catches them doing something bad.
What’s interesting, though, is that you also feel de
ceitful when you make this face. This feeling doesn't last when you look your conversation partner in the eye. This shows that the speaker is, in a way, forcing the listener to conform to his rhythm and his perspective. You can avoid this control by looking away and smiling which makes you look deceitful

 

 

January 30th, 2007

Acceptance Test

Blockers on the stage just never die.  They can be injured, or they can just barely save themselves, but they always have at least three important lines that they just have to get out.

English version (excerpts)

2007

Apr

May

Jun

Jan

Feb

Mar

     
    2006
    Dec
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

 

 

 

zurück zur Seite "Impro"

Dan Richter